Which License Is Better MIT Or Apache?
The MIT license is if you're afraid no one will use your code; you're making the licensing as short and non-intimidating as possible. The Apache License you are somewhat afraid of no one using your code, but you are also afraid of legal ambiguity and patent trolls.
Is Apache License compatible with MIT?
Your project is licensed compatibly. There's nothing in Apache that precludes you from using it in an MIT project. Simply put, you can apply whatever license you want on your code. You can't change someone else's license, but you can convey someone else's code into your project under a compatible license.
Is the MIT license compatible with the Apache License Version 2 (APLv2)?
Their interpretation depends on the technical usage of the licensed software. Therefore, it's difficult to determine the legal risks of using open source software, especially for developers, who are not usually legal experts....Top open source licenses by risk.
Top open source licenses and legal risk for developers - Synopsys
What is the difference between MIT license and Apache License?
MIT gives you only a copyright license. For Apache, you have to carry the license with you whenever you distribute it, and modified files must also have prominent notices that the files have been changed, and third, giving proper credit to the authors, and they include not just copyright, but patent and trademarks.
What's the difference between Apache v2.0 and MIT license ...
Many of the issues with the license are due to the evilness of software patents. ... Because the MIT licence has no explicit grant of patent rights as a condition of use of the code you open yourself up to abuse from bad actors.
The MIT licence is community hostile - Janis Lesinskis' Blog