What Is The Difference Between GNU And MIT License?
It seems to me that the chief difference between the MIT license and GPL is that the MIT doesn't require modifications be open sourced whereas the GPL does. The GPL doesn't require you to release your modifications only because you made them.
This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. Some people call this license “the MIT License,” but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software.
Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project
Should I use MIT or GNU license?
GNU GPL obliges you to do some things that MIT doesn't, making MIT friendlier to people who want to sell or re-sell the covered software. GNU makes you make your code freely available, even if you are only incorporating GNU GPL software. (It's different for LGPL).
What are the key differences between the GNU General Public ...
The MIT License is a permissive free software license originating at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the late 1980s. As a permissive license, it puts only very limited restriction on reuse and has, therefore, high license compatibility. ... Notable companies using the MIT License include Microsoft (.
MIT License - Wikipedia
What is the difference between MIT license and Apache license?
MIT gives you only a copyright license. For Apache, you have to carry the license with you whenever you distribute it, and modified files must also have prominent notices that the files have been changed, and third, giving proper credit to the authors, and they include not just copyright, but patent and trademarks.
What's the difference between Apache v2.0 and MIT license ... - Quora