💡 Should I Use MIT Or GNU License? - Clever.net

Should I Use MIT Or GNU License?

GNU GPL obliges you to do some things that MIT doesn't, making MIT friendlier to people who want to sell or re-sell the covered software. GNU makes you make your code freely available, even if you are only incorporating GNU GPL software.

Is GNU compatible with MIT?

This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. Some people call this license “the MIT License,” but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software.

Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project

Should I use MIT license?

Arguably, the biggest advantage of using the MIT License is that it is very permissive. It is not only welcoming to open-source developers, but also to businesses (Proprietary). This quality of the license allows it to be both business-friendly and open-source friendly, while still making it possible to be monetized.

The realm of an MIT licensed software code - iPleaders

Should I use MIT or Apache license?

The MIT license is if you're afraid no one will use your code; you're making the licensing as short and non-intimidating as possible. The Apache License you are somewhat afraid of no one using your code, but you are also afraid of legal ambiguity and patent trolls.

Which License Should I Use? MIT vs. Apache vs. GPL - Exygy

What is difference between MIT and GNU license?

And both licenses do not restrict to distribute the software. It seems to me that the chief difference between the MIT license and GPL is that the MIT doesn't require modifications be open sourced whereas the GPL does. The GPL doesn't require you to release your modifications only because you made them.

MIT vs GPL license [closed] - Stack Overflow