Gpl Vs Mit
The MIT License is compatible with many copyleft licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL). Any software licensed under the terms of the MIT License can be integrated with software licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL.
MIT License - Wikipedia
SCO's Chris Sontag argues there are many reasons that the GNU General Public License is bad for the software industry. The General Public License is not good for the software industry for a variety of reasons.
No, the GPL is not good for the software industry | Network World
The main argument for MIT or any other permissive license over GPL is that more people may end up using your software. Even if all of the downstream user-developers don't open-source their contributions, many of them will. ... BSD is under an MIT-like license.
Which License Should I Use? MIT vs. Apache vs. GPL - Exygy
What is difference between GPL and MIT license?
GPL is free software as well as MIT is, both licenses do not restrict you to bring together the code where as "include" is always two-way. In copyright for a combined work (that is two or more works form together a work), it does not make much of a difference if the one work is "larger" than the other or not.
MIT vs GPL license [closed] - Stack Overflow