Should I Use GPL Or MIT?
The main argument for MIT or any other permissive license over GPL is that more people may end up using your software. Even if all of the downstream user-developers don't open-sourceopen-sourceOpen-source software (OSS) is computer software that is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code to anyone and for any purpose. Open-source software may be developed in a collaborative public manner
Can I use GPL library in MIT project?
3 Answers. No; incorporating or linking against GPL requires that your project-as-a-whole be distributed under GPL. But you can include MIT licensed parts (or another GPL-compatible license) in the project.
If I'm using a GPL 3 library in my project, can I license my project
The MIT License is compatible with many copyleft licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL). Any software licensed under the terms of the MIT License can be integrated with software licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL.
MIT License - Wikipedia
This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. Some people call this license “the MIT License,” but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software.
Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project
Arguably, the biggest advantage of using the MIT License is that it is very permissive. It is not only welcoming to open-source developers, but also to businesses (Proprietary). This quality of the license allows it to be both business-friendly and open-source friendly, while still making it possible to be monetized.
The realm of an MIT licensed software code - iPleaders Blog