Why GPL License Is Bad?
Many consider the GPL a "business-unfriendly" license because of its so-called viral nature: All software derived from GPL-licensed code must in turn be licensed under the GPL. ... If the GPL doesn't work for you, you can purchase the software under an alternative commercial license.
Does Android violate the GPL?
Google isn't violating the GPL, but other vendors may be. Recent comments about Android's alleged violations of the GPL have been proven to be little more than smoke and mirrors, according to Free Software advocate Bradley M. Kuhn, but there are instances of Android GPL violations out there, Kuhn writes.
Where the real Android GPL violations are | Computerworld
SCO's Chris Sontag argues there are many reasons that the GNU General Public License is bad for the software industry. The General Public License is not good for the software industry for a variety of reasons.
No, the GPL is not good for the software industry | Network World
Software under the GPL may be run for all purposes, including commercial purposes and even as a tool for creating proprietary software, such as when using GPL-licensed compilers. Users or companies who distribute GPL-licensed works (e.g. software), may charge a fee for copies or give them free of charge.
GNU General Public License - Wikipedia
Why is GPL v3 bad?
GPLv3 enforces copyleft upon anyone who links to a GPLv3 application. There is a risk that simply including or using bash4+ could infect the system with GPLv3 compliance requirements, forcing Apple to publish their proprietary source code.
I don't fully understand why GPLv3 is not good for Apple. I did try to ask ...