Mpl Vs Gpl
Broadly speaking, the scope of the MPL, LGPL, and GPL can be summarized this way: MPL: The copyleft applies to any files containing MPLed code. LGPL: The copyleft applies to any library based on LGPLed code. GPL: The copyleft applies to all software based on GPLed code.
GPL is enforceable as it's essentially a copyright license. The copyright holders of the GPL software can choose to enforce the GPL on the distributed or derivative works of the software. For example, the FSF holds the copyrights on many pieces of the GNU system, such as the GNU Compiler Collection.
Top 10 GPL License Questions Answered - WhiteSource
Many of the most common free-software licenses, especially the permissive licenses, such as the original MIT/X license, BSD licenses (in the three-clause and two-clause forms, though not the original four-clause form), MPL 2.0, and LGPL, are GPL-compatible.
License compatibility - Wikipedia
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source software license developed and maintained by the Mozilla Foundation.
Mozilla Public License - Wikipedia
The MPL 2.0 is neither a permissive license like the MIT License (which allows for use of the licensed code with very few restrictions) nor a strong copyleft license like the GPL v2 License (which places numerous restrictions on use). Often termed a “weak copyleft” license, MPL 2.0 falls somewhere in the middle.
Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0