💡 Mozilla Public License 2.0 Vs Mit - Clever.net

Mozilla Public License 2.0 Vs Mit

The MPL 2.0 is neither a permissive license like the MIT License (which allows for use of the licensed code with very few restrictions) nor a strong copyleft license like the GPL v2 License (which places numerous restrictions on use). Often termed a “weak copyleft” license, MPL 2.0 falls somewhere in the middle.

Is Mozilla Public License open source?

Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source/free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 (html | plain text). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

Mozilla Public Licence

Is Mozilla Public License permissive?

It is a weak copyleft license, characterized as a middle ground between permissive software licenses and the GNU General Public License (GPL), that seeks to balance the concerns of proprietary and open-source developers. ...

Mozilla Public License - Wikipedia

Is the MIT license Foss?

The MIT license falls under the permissive (or BSD-style) of FOSS licenses. BSD-style licenses allow any user to do anything with the code, granted they provide attribution and do not claim any liability in the future.

What is the MIT License? Top 10 questions answered | Snyk

Which open source license is best?

Top open source licenses by risk

Top open source licenses and legal risk for developers - Synopsys