Is MPL Compatible With GPL?
Many of the most common free-software licenses, especially the permissive licenses, such as the original MIT/X license, BSD licenses (in the three-clause and two-clause forms, though not the original four-clause form), MPL 2.0, and LGPL, are GPL-compatible.
Is Apache compatible with MPL?
A good example of these subtle incompatibilities is between MPL 1.1 and Apache 2.0. ... Aligning these triggering conditions is what allowed us to be more comfortable that Apache 2.0 and MPL 2.0 are compatible.
MPL 2.0, copyleft, and license compatibility | Opensource.com
The MPL 2.0 is neither a permissive license like the MIT License (which allows for use of the licensed code with very few restrictions) nor a strong copyleft license like the GPL v2 License (which places numerous restrictions on use). Often termed a “weak copyleft” license, MPL 2.0 falls somewhere in the middle.
Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0 - FOSSA
Is Wtfpl GPL compatible?
WTFPL is a permissive free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. As a public domain like license, the WTFPL is essentially the same as dedication to the public domain. It allows redistribution and modification of the work under any terms.
WTFPL - Wikipedia
What does GPL compatible mean?
What does it mean to say a license is “compatible with the GPL?” (# WhatDoesCompatMean) It means that the other license and the GNU GPL are compatible; you can combine code released under the other license with code released under the GNU GPL in one larger program.
Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU Licenses